Higher Education Making Headlines in Topeka

It’s only been 96 hours since our last newsletter, which shows you just how fast things can happen in Topeka. Higher Education has been a topic of choice in the capital city with committees in both the House and Senate taking up several bills this week that could impact funding and policy.

Senate Panel Endorses Bill to Require Financial Prospectus for all Kansas College Degrees

On Wednesday, the Senate’s budget committee passed legislationthat will require all public universities and colleges in Kansas to gather and produce uniform financial information related to the cost of a degree and expected earnings of graduates.

The legislation would come with an estimated price tag of $2 million that would be required for the state’s 32 public higher-ed institutions to annually compile the necessary data. That cost would triple if graduates were offered a $100 incentive to complete personal surveys as suggested in the legislation. Data collected from these surveys would be used to help compile expected earnings data for each prospectus.

Comparison shopping is important for students and parents who are selecting a university or college. Academic quality and selection, affordability, campus amenities, safety, family ties, and many other factors play in to where a student chooses to attend.

Pittsburg State believes in transparency and helping a student choose the degree program that is right for them. This is why your university currently provides much of this information in its College Portrait narrative, which is available on the front of its webpage.

Pittsburg State currently offers more than 200 degree programs, which means it would annually have produce 200+ financial prospectus publications. This would be a challenging task especially given the current economic environment.

Senate Ways and Means Committee Recommends Higher Ed Budget

Last week, the Senate Ways and Means Committee made the surprising decision to change the governor’s FY16 and FY17 funding recommendation for higher-ed and, instead, reallocated resources among the state’s universities and the Kansas Board of Regents.

In broad terms, the subcommittee cut $4.7 from the University of Kansas main campus and $3.1 million from Kansas State University. It then reallocated $4.7 million of those monies to the University of Kansas Medical Center for the expansion of the KUMC-Wichita and Medical Scholarships; $1 million to Pittsburg State University’s School of Transportation and $2 million to the Kansas Comprehensive Grant Program.

Interestingly, the committee changed Comprehensive Grant Program language to reserve at least 75 percent of the total available dollars (about $17.7 million with the new $2 million addition) for independent, private colleges. Those colleges currently get about 50 percent of the grant money. The end result, according to the Kansas Board of Regents, is that more than 1,500 fewer Kansas students would receive need-based financial aid if the proposed changes were to pass.

The targeted enhancement for Pittsburg State’s School of Transportation is an unexpected but appreciated addition. It reflects Pittsburg State’s growing stature within the state and confidence in our direction and impact.

However, it is important to look at the larger picture when it comes to higher-ed funding within the State of Kansas. The Kansas Board of Regents is concerned with cuts (to KSU and KU) and funding shifts included in the proposal. Of greatest concern to the Board, and Pittsburg State President Scott, are the broader policy implications, specifically any shift away from a block grant funding approach and erosion of decision making authority currently granted the KBOR.

Sexual Assault Bill – HB2266

The week began in the House with the Committee on Education taking up HB 2266, which focused on the serious issue of sexual assault and dating violence on college campuses. HB2266 would mandate the adoption of a sexual assault policy that includes an affirmative consent standard in determining whether consent was given in any case involving sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking involving a student, both on and off campus.

Pittsburg State University, along with the Kansas State University, was asked to provide information about campus educational initiatives, policies, and preventive measures, related to sexual assault, that are currently in place.

Comments from Pittsburg State centered around its proactive health educational programming and safety services as well as the federal regulations currently in place (which already address the concerns of the bill). These programs include mandatory sexual assault prevention training for all first-year students, an award-winning Peer Health Educational program entitled “Gorillas In Your Midst,” and SafeRide and Gus Bus transportation services.

After a brief discussion, HB2266 was tabled. 

Legislative Turnaround Update: February Revenues, Budget, and City of Pittsburg Land Exchange

Friday, February 27th marked the halfway point of the 2015 Legislative Session. With the turnaround looming the legislators quickened their work and defied all predictions by finishing onThursday night and banking the Friday for the end of the session. All nonexempt bills that were not passed from their chamber of origin are now dead for all practical concerns and, following a long weekend, the members returned to Topeka on Wednesday to deal with the rest. Below is a brief recap of some of the more interesting developments from the session thus far.

February Revenues
On Friday revenue estimates for February arrived and they brought some much needed good news. Revenue for the month was $22.1 million above estimates. While the state is still $37 million below estimates for the fiscal year with four months yet remaining this was a welcome change. What remains to be seen is if this was a one-month uptick or the beginning of a trend.
Both House Appropriations and Senate Ways and Means continue to slog through the process of putting together a budget that meets the state requirements for core services and matches the revenue numbers the Tax Committees have to work with. It has been a tumultuous first half of the session with money being taken and added to programs at a frenzied pace. One of the most telling examples was the House Social Services Budget Committee removing the $7.2 million in funding from Parents as Teachers only to have it returned at the rail the following day and the proposal sent back to committee for further review. The mosaic that is the FY 2016 and 2017 budget will be an ongoing issue for the remainder of the session.

Budget Testimony
On February 10th and 11th, President Scott presented testimony on behalf of PSU to House and Senate budget subcommittees. Our testimony focused on the strong growth, momentum, and impact at PSU and the threat posed by any reductions in our base funding. President Scott urged support of Governor Brownback’s budget proposal of stable funding for PSU.

The House Education Budget Subcommittee issued their recommendations on February 19th endorsing, in large part, the Governor’s recommendation for stable funding.  The full House Appropriations Committee adopted the subcommittee report into the full budget bill, which will be debated later in the session.
The Senate Education Budget Subcommittee issued their recommendations on March 4, 2015. The Senate Subcommittee proposed maintaining funding for PSU and an additional $1 million in new funding for both FY16 and FY17 to support development of a School of Transportation in the College of Technology. On March 5th, the Senate Ways and Means Committee adopted the subcommittee recommendations but left open the possibility ofreopening a number of higher education related issues during the future omnibus budget discussion.

Budget and Tax Policy
The issue of taxes are lurking in the background and shadowing all budget debates. A host of proposals have come forward ranging from limiting how long property tax exemptions can be used for renewable energy sources to taxes on aviation fuel. Tax rates on businesses, STAR Bonds, and ROZ exemptions have also been discussed. These are in addition to the proposed increases in alcohol, tobacco, and agricultural land property tax. Each of these has faced harsh criticism and opposition from interested parties.
The current plan appears to be that the Budget committees will put together the budget and then the Tax committees will figure out how to pay for it. It is not the usual way it is done but it should prove interesting moving forward.

PSU/City of Pittsburg Land Exchange
For more than a year PSU and City of Pittsburg officials have been exploring a land exchange in the southeastern corner of the city to facilitate planned residential growth of the city as well as future planned development for PSU. On February 24th, the Pittsburg City Commission unanimously approved the proposed exchange.
The agreement provides 72.7 acres to the city in exchange for 30.3 acres to PSU. This will provide the city with approximately 50 acres of prime residential development land, significantly supporting the residential (as suggested by the recent housing study) and economic development needs of the city.
The exchange would clean up the map and rearrange ownership providing PSU a single undivided parcel of just over 100 acres with frontage road access to a major road (Centennial). This will support future planned development and expansion for the area and maintain the site used for international Baja competitions.
Overall the proposal substantially cleans up the map and supports growth and development for both the University and the City. We’vereceived positive feedback and support from the Pittsburg community and are excited to work with the city on another partnership that promotes the common good of our community. We are fortunate to have such a strong partnership relationship with the City of Pittsburg. Now our work turns to securing legislative approval of the proposed exchange, which we expect during this session.

Legislative Update: Revenue Challenges, Current Year Cut to PSU, and Push for Stable Funding

At the end of the first month of the 2015 Legislative Session we saw a serious increase in the volume of work and bill introductions as the last day to introduce bills fast approaches. Friday the 13th of February could have had an even more ominous feel as it would have marked the day the state could not meet its bill paying obligations. Fortunately, for those expecting payment, the House and Senate worked and sent a Recision bill to the Governor. With that hard lifting done the Legislature’s attention will now move to the two-year budget bill and dealing with the revenue shortfall.

Revenue Estimates and Actual Receipts
January Revenue collections were $47 million below estimates. The Department of Revenue pointed to less than expected sales tax collections as the primary cause of the shortfall.

Recision Bill
The big work done last week was on the Rescission Bill. On February 4th the House of Representatives passed the Recision Bill on a vote of 88-34. The bill transfers $158.5 million from the State Highway Fund, delays nearly $8 million in KPERS investments, sweeps $12 million from the Kansas Endowment for Youth Fund, and just over $7.1 from the Job Creation Program Fund. Rep. Grossrode offered an amendment to maintain about half the school district equalization payments originally slated to be delayed until June. As it was placed in a Senate Bill as a Substitute Bill the Senate had the option to concur on February 5th. Following a brief debate it passed the Senate on a 24-13 vote. Governor Brownback signed the Recision Bill into law on Friday, Feburary 6th. A massive appropriations bill will likely be used as a final adjustment once the April Revenue numbers are released. An interesting side note to the recision bill is a bill that has been introduced in Senate Ways and Means to move the Revenue Report from April to May 4 to allow for a more accurate estimate.

The decision with greatest impact to higher education (and PIttsburg State specifically), came on Thursday with Governor Brownback’s announcement of additional allotments. While higher education and K-12 had been held harmless in the first round of allotments, declining state revenues forced additional allotments, this time including cuts to education funding. These one time cuts for the current fiscal year total $44.5 million: $28.3 million in cuts to K-12 and $16.2 million for higher education. This effective 2% reduction in state university budgets means a cut of $709,717 for PSU. It is hoped this additional allotment will provide the state with sufficient funds to meet its obligations through the remainder of the current fiscal year, which ends June 30th.

In response to the Governor’s allotments, PSU President Steve Scott issued the following statement:

“While we are disappointed to receive this news, we are not surprised,” said President Steve Scott. “The state’s fiscal difficulties have been apparent for some time, and we have been preparing ourselves for a funding reduction. Pittsburg State’s portion of the allotment will be $709,717 for the current fiscal year. While this is not an insignificant amount, we are prepared to address the cut with contingency funds.”

“Our concerns are now focused on the upcoming fiscal year and the impact additional cuts would have on our students and our campus. Through the efforts of our faculty, staff, students, donors, and community, the university has generated considerable momentum over the past few years. These cuts and the possibility of more cuts threaten that momentum and could ultimately serve to undermine the university’s future.”

Shifting Focus … Insuring Stable Funding in the The Two-Year Budget Bill
With the passage of the Recision Bill and additional allotments issued, focus will now shift in earnest form the current fiscal year to work on the next two year budget. Budget committees are now beginning serious work on the FY16 & FY17 budget. Starting with the Governors Budget Proposal, which you will recall was issued on January 6th. As part of the budget process, President Scott testifies this week before House and Senate budget committees.

As we have urged from the beginning of this session, for our great momentum to continue, it is essential that alumni and friends of Pittsburg State University (and higher education generally) get involved in the legislative process. Our work is essential in supporting the economic health and vitality of Kansas. If you have not yet done so, please show your support for PSU and higher education by joining the Gorilla Legislative Network.

Welcome to the 2015 Legislative Session: A Special Video Message from PSU President Steve Scott

As you are likely aware, the Kansas Legislature began its 2015 session on Monday, January 12th. This is a vital session for Pitt State and the important role the university plays in the SEK region and the state. Unfortunately, the momentum and impact of PSU is threatened by the revenue challenges facing Kansas. A continued investment in higher education is an essential to the future of Kansas’ economic engine. Now more than ever, we must come together to advocate on behalf of higher-ed and of Pittsburg State.

Below is a special video message from President Steve Scott regarding this legislative session and the importance of your advocacy. I urge you to watch this video and to get involved. Join your fellow Gorillas in this advocacy effort by signing up as a member of the Gorilla Legislative Network. For updates throughout the session, follow @CapitolGorilla on Twitter and subscribe to this blog. We will continue our successful momentum, but we cannot do it without your help.

Governor’s Budget Proposal Would Stabilize Higher Education Funding

On Friday morning, Governor Brownback released his budget proposal for review and consideration by the legislature. While the legislature officially gaveled in the 2015 session on Monday, January 12th the release of the governor’s report signals the start of the discussion on the issue which will likely dominate the next 90 days – how to best address the projected revenue shortfall for FY16 & 17.

From the perspective of Pittsburg State, and higher education generally, the governor’s budget proposal is welcome news. In the proposal the Governor demonstrates his commitment to higher education investment and recognition of our vital importance to growing the Kansas economy. To this end, Governor Brownback recommends stabilized funding for higher education for the next two fiscal years.  This includes continued funding of important enhancements Pittsburg State has received over the past few legislative sessions – namely, the School of Construction, Polymer Chemistry Initiative, and the Kanas Center for Career and Technical Education. 

While we are very appreciative of the Governor’s commitment to higher education funding, this really is simply the start of the conversation. This week the legislature will begin in earnest unpacking and dissecting the governor’s proposal.  While we have experienced incredible success and momentum over the past few years, that momentum is far from guaranteed. For that momentum to continue we need the legislature to support the governor’s budget proposal for higher education. 

Quick poll

Legislative Turnaround Recess: A Great Opportunity to Connect with Your Legislators

This week the 2014 Kansas legislative session will break for their annual Turnaround recess. Legislators will be in their home districts March 1st – 4th giving you the opportunity to share the importance of continued investment in higher education and, specifically, Pittsburg State University.
As a reminder, our advocacy this session is focused on supporting Governor Brownback’s higher education budget recommendations, which include the partial restoration of salary funding and the investment in a new Center for Career Technical Education Teacher Development and Innovation (CTE-TDI) at Pittsburg State University’s Kansas Technology Center.

Pittsburg State, along with other Kansas higher education institutions, is committed to providing students with degree programs that combine advanced academics with practical skill sets. This approach allows students to achieve their full potential while meeting the needs of the Kansas economy. As you well know, continued investment in Pittsburg State and higher education throughout Kansas will be essential to the growth of our state.

Legislators will return home during this extended weekend and many will be attending various town hall style meetings, breakfasts, and coffees. This is a great opportunity for you to share our message of growth.

For those Gorillas in southeast Kansas, one such opportunity will be the Pittsburg Area Chamber First Saturday Legislative Breakfast this Saturday, March 1, at 8 a.m. The breakfast will be held in DePaul Hall at Via Christi Hospital, 1 Mt Carmel Way, Pittsburg, KS.

If you know of other legislator public forums in your area, please share the information in the comments section below.

Thank you for your continued advocacy and Go Gorillas!

Governor Recommends Partial Restoration of Higher Education Budget Cuts as Well as New Targeted Investments

Yesterday, Governor Brownback presented his revised budget recommendations to the legislature (the full Budget Brief can be found here).  Among those proposed revisions are partial restoration of the FY14 and FY15 higher education budget cuts passed last legislative session. Included in the proposal is $8.33 million in new funding for targeted higher education investments – including a new $1 million annual enhancement for PSU’s proposed Center for Career Technical Education Teacher Development and Innovation  (CTE-TDI). Here’s the breakdown of the Governor’s higher education budget recommendations:


  • 50% pro rata restoration of “salary cap” ($5.1M), distributed as follows:
    • FHSU – $0
    • KSU – $949,829
    • KSU-ESARP – $1.5M
    • ESU – $572,488
    • PSU – $0
    • KU – $77,935
    • KUMC – $1.7M
    • WSU – $281,267
  • Tiered Technical Education for High School Students – fully fund current estimate ($9.25M)


  • 100% restoration of University “salary cap” ($5.8M)
  • Tiered Technical Education for High School Students – fully fund current estimate ($15.25M)
  • Targeted Enhancements:
    • Pittsburg State University – Center for CTE Teacher Development & Innovation ($1M)
    • Fort Hays State – Information Systems Engineering ($760,111)
    • Emporia State – Honors College ($1M)
    • Kansas State University – School of Architecture ($1.5M)
    • University of Kansas – Kansas Institute for Translational Chemical Biology ($2M)
    • KU Medical Center – Rural Health Bridging Program ($70,000)
    • Wichita State – Technology Transfer Facility ($2M)

In total, Governor Brownback’s recommendations would add or restore $14,4M in higher education spending for FY14 and $29.5M for FY15. While we are pleased with the inclusion of the proposed targeted investments, absent from the recommendations is the hoped for restoration of the 1.5% cut incurred by Kansas universities for both the current fiscal year and in FY15.  For PSU this cut represents more than $500,000 in our base operating budget. Our advocacy this session will focus on support for these revised recommendations as well as full restoration of the 1.5% cut in FY15.

Supreme Court Ruling will set the Session’s Course

At a glance …

  • Legislature awaits K-12 funding ruling by Kansas Supreme Court
  • If Supreme Court upholds lower court ruling, lawmakers will be asked to increase K-12 funding by approximately $450 million
  • Ruling will play major factor in direction of 2014 session

It certainly doesn’t feel like an entire year has gone by, but state lawmakers have returned to Topeka and the 2014 Legislative session is now officially underway. It seems as if every session turns on a specific topic put forward by lawmakers (in 2012 it was redistricting & incomes tax rates, in 2013 sales tax rates), but unlike year’s past, the 2014 session will be framed by the decision of an outside body.

The Kansas Supreme Court will soon release its decision as to the question of whether the state must comply with a lower-court ruling requiring the GOP-led legislature and Republican Sam Brownback to increase annual funding for K-12 education by an estimated $450 million, or 14% above last year’s level. (Wall Street Journal)

In light of recent dramatic tax cuts by the legislature, an affirmative ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court would place lawmakers in the delicate position of either creating new funding sources or cutting current funding streams to state agencies. As the Topeka Capital Journal notes, if the decision is upheld it “would bust a state budget that, despite [last session’s] sales tax decision, is already projected to run a deficit by 2018.”

Neither option is attractive. As you might imagine, lawmakers are anxiously awaiting the Supreme Court’s final decision which could come as early as this week.

State Investment in Higher Education at Risk

At a glance …

  • The 2013 State Legislature cut Pittsburg State’s budget by more than $1.5 million over two years
  • Pittsburg State’s base funding has been cut by  more than $5 million since 2008
  • State investment in Pittsburg State is at approximately the same level as it was in 2004
  • Pittsburg State enrollment has grown by more than 11 percent since 2004
  • While the 2013 Kansas Legislature cut higher education funding, 37 other states increased higher education funding

Just as the future of K-12 funding is unknown, so too is the level of investment the state will make in public higher-education. Last year, lawmakers cut higher-education by more than $37 million over a two year period as a result of their push to lower income tax cuts. This cut includes a flat 1.5 percent decrease in funding and a so-called “salary cap” provision that added an additional 1.1 percent loss in state funding. For Pittsburg State this meant a cut of more than $900,000 in Fiscal Year 14 or 2.6 percent with an additional $650,000 set to be cut in Fiscal Year 15.

Pittsburg State was able to accommodate the state’s reduced investment by adjusting its operating budget for FY14, but these types of cuts place Pitt State’s ability to compete at risk. In fact, Pittsburg State’s base funding has been cut by more than $5 million since 2008 and now sits at approximately the same level it did in 2004. Much has changed over the past 10 years, including Pitt State’s enrollment, which has grown by more than 11 percent in the past decade.

Pittsburg State did receive a targeted enhancement for a new polymer science program with an additional allocation of $500,000 per year but the cut to base funding was extremely disappointing giving Kansas’ strong tradition of offering one of the strongest statewide systems of higher education in the nation.

Our great state’s reputation of being a source of outstanding academics is now at risk. In fact, Kansas was one of only five states in the nation to cut its investment in higher education last year. A well-educated, well-prepared workforce is essential for business to grow and compete in the global marketplace.

The governor has indicated he intends to push for at least a partial restoration of funding for higher-ed this year, but the future for this funding is anything but certain. Pittsburg State will continue to advocate on behalf of its students, faculty and staff by urging lawmakers to remove the “salary cap” provision passed during last year’s session and restore the state’s investment in higher education.